Jefferson, deeply inspired by classical antiquity, helped popularize Greco-Roman design principles in the young United States, believing classical architecture symbolized civic virtue, republicanism, and intellectual enlightenment. Architect Benjamin Henry Latrobe further advanced the movement through his influential public commissions, helping establish Greek Revival as the foundation for the monumental classicism associated with early American government buildings. Examples of this influence can be seen in the neoclassical elements of the United States Capitol and the Second Bank of the United States. In the United States, Greek Revival architecture flourished between roughly 1820 and 1860 and became especially popular in the antebellum South, where plantation owners and wealthy urban merchants embraced the style as a symbol of old world permanence, historical culture, and prosperity. The Bellamy site was built from 1859-61.
At the Bellamy Mansion Museum, Italianate influences appear throughout all three buildings on the property. The low roof pitches, tan-pink stucco and limewash finishes, arched windows, projecting eaves with ornate corbels, and deeply exaggerated cornices all reflect the style’s Mediterranean inspiration. Most distinctive is the belvedere crowning the main house — a rooftop architectural feature whose Italian name literally means “beautiful view.” Beyond serving as a visual focal point, the belvedere also provided ventilation and views of downtown Wilmington, blending practical function with romantic ideals of Italianate design.
The combination of Greek Revival and Italianate architecture at the Bellamy site illustrates a transitional moment in nineteenth-century American design. The use of Greek Revival could convey stability, democratic value, and classical grandeur, while Italianate introduced a more romantic and picturesque sensibility. Together, these styles communicated the Bellamy family’s wealth, education, and awareness of international architectural trends. Yet the mansion’s architecture also reveals the contradictions of the antebellum South: ideals of beauty, democracy, and civilization were materially supported by mass enslavement and embedded within a social order rooted in racial inequality and white supremacy.
0 Comments
Of course we’ve all heard those words before, perhaps countless times from the back seats and typically as we head out for summer vacation. It’s a phrase that’s been around for as long as there have been children and cars. But let’s imagine what summer vacations were like for the Bellamy children long before paved roads, let alone cars, even existed. Grovely and points north and south “By the time Ellen and John D. Bellamy, Jr. were old enough to appreciate Grovely’s bounty, their family had formulated a set lifestyle geared to the season,” according to local historian Diane Cobb Cashman. “May and June found them at Grovely [a plantation in Brunswick County purchased by their father in 1842]. Then, as the oppressive heat that spawned ‘the sickly season’ [Yellow Fever], as well as the horrible stench that came from neighboring plantations’ flooded rice fields, came upon them, they moved to higher ground at Salem, Red Springs, and Laurinburg or caught the salt breeze at Smithville [Southport] or the Sound for the duration of the summer.” Pittsboro in Chatham County was also “a favorite summer residence for many of Wilmington’s old families.” Circa 1860 map showing towns like Salem and Pittsboro at top left where Wilmington families sought cooler temperatures; Lake Waccamaw just south of Whitesville and Smithville on the coast were also popular summer spots, and of course the Sound areas along the coast were most desirable for their balmy breezes and white sands.
Meanwhile, back in Wilmington... When in Wilmington, John Bellamy Jr. recalled that as a boy, "my companions and I would go down [to the riverfront] ...where vessels loaded with naval stores would sail to New England, and they would return with shiploads of ice, in large blocks! These were unloaded on elevated platforms and run into ice-houses especially made for that purpose; the boys would eagerly pick up the broken lumps of ice and use it—greatly relished in hot weather!" Bellamy's assistant architect Rufus Bunnell helps us envision summertime in antebellum Wilmington in several of his diary entries: “Everything droops,” he wrote. “Up climbs the mercury, the heat mastering the old town.” On a sultry summer day in 1859, Bunnell noted that the stores were all closed and the city seemed partly deserted. Taking a walk after breakfast with some friends, “we saw an excursion steamer well loaded down, cross the Cape Fear River and land its passengers for a train of waiting cars in the great wooded and marshy district over there, bound for Lake Waccamaw.” Vacationers could access the beautiful waters of this large, shallow freshwater lake in northeastern Columbus County near Whiteville by railroad, as well as by steamboat.
Summers by the seaside Returning to Bunnell’s diary entries, he observed that many Wilmingtonians summered at the Sound “out on the Atlantic coast.” From the early part of the 19th century, well-to-do North Carolinians came to the ocean to escape the summer heat, breathe the salt air, and bathe in the ocean. It was widely believed that the supposedly healthy beach environment protected residents and visitors from the ravages of such diseases as malaria. The Sounds, including Greenville, Masonboro and Wrightsville, were popular summer colonies for Wilmington residents, according to Historic Architecture of New Hanover County, North Carolina. “Originally intended to be used for rice culture and the manufacture of salt in the 18th and early 19th century, these plantations along the marshes had, by the mid-19th century, become retreats away from Wilmington. "The area near Wrightsville, above the north bank of Bradley’s Creek, was especially desirable. It was away from the swarms of mosquitoes that populated the adjacent regions, and the views across the Hammocks (later renamed Harbor island) and Banks Channel to Wrightsville Beach were as dramatic then as today.” In 1886, Bradley’s Creek was the perfect setting for a new home belonging to Sarah Green and Pembroke Jones to be named Airlie in honor of Pembroke’s family home in Scotland; Sarah dubbed it Airlie-on-the-Sound. Meanwhile, just a few miles south in Masonboro, lumber magnate and one of Wilmington’s richest citizens Oscar Parsley purchased a home known as Finian in 1852 (later destroyed by fire in 1931). We know O.G. Parsley as a friend of John D. Bellamy, who encouraged the doctor and his family to join him in Floral College with other families taking refuge from the war. Ellen wrote that “the Parsleys and our family lived most pleasantly together, my two older sisters being devoted friends of the Parsley girls." Masonboro was also the summer retreat of William White Harriss, Wilmington physician, businessman, and civic leader, as well as his son George. William was Eliza Bellamy’s brother and George her nephew.
By the end of the 1880s, Wilmington and the coastal communities of Wrightsville and Wrightsville Beach had been linked by rail, affording residents of the City access to the ocean and a style of life rare in other areas of the nation. With the construction of Lumina pavilion by Tidewater Power Company president Hugh MacRae in 1905, a day at the beach ended with music and dancing every night on the huge dance floor overlooked by a spectator balcony, and movies once a week. “Out of the darkness, the lights at Lumina were dazzling,” recalled Lillian Bellamy Boney, a great granddaughter of Dr. Bellamy, in a 2009 Wrightsville Beach Magazine article. In its heyday, Lumina pavilion was a hot spot for big bands like Paul Whiteman, Cab Calloway, and Jimmy Dorsey [sadly, it was demolished in 1973]. By the first decades of the 20th century, the automobile had become widespread, and bridges spanned the waterways along the major routes across Hanover County. Ellen Bellamy certainly witnessed much progress in her lifetime (1852-1946), from travel by horse and carriage, ferries, steamboats, trains and trolleys to cars, buses and airplanes. She said it herself as she wrote later in life: “It is such a pleasure to have [my brother John] during the summer to take his mid-day meal while his family are summering on Wrightsville Beach only a short distance away in these days of fast travel.” A Different Kind of Summer Even after the era of enslavement ended, beach vacations were not necessarily common among Blacks in the south. In fact, Jim Crow laws barred Blacks from visiting the beaches frequented by Whites. That is until 1922 when two African Americans - Rowland and Nathan Freeman - developed a resort called Seabreeze (also known as Sea Breeze or Freeman’s Beach) on the east side of U.S. 421 just north of Snow’s Cut and Carolina Beach.
Also in the early 1930s, the town of Atlantic Beach - known to some as the ‘Black Pearl' - was formed as a vacation getaway for black families. This small coastal area in South Carolina grew to become a popular vacation destination, and black-owned businesses thrived in this close-knit community nestled in the heart of North Myrtle Beach. Many Atlantic Beach residents are descendants of the Gullah-Geechee people, former slaves from the West Coast of Africa who lived and worked in the coastal area from around Jacksonville, Florida to as far north as Wilmington. You can read much more on Gullah-Geechee heritage here.
There is genius in simplicity and the cistern system is simply genius. In Wilmington, before city water was supplied, the water that fell off your roof mainly fed the wells of your neighbors - and hand dug wells were not very deep, comparatively speaking. The well at Bellamy, for example, was probably no more than 40-50 feet deep, just enough to tap the water table. The water at this depth is not completely free of contaminants and may have even stained pots and pans - especially porcelain. Therefore, clean rainwater would be a great secondary source of drinking and bathing water, as well as irrigation for the plants and hydration for animals on the property. Sustainability as a 19th-Century Necessity The Bellamy site is half an acre (or roughly 22,000 square feet), and the house has a footprint of 3,000 square feet under the roof. On a roof of this size, with only 1” of rainfall, the amount of water that runs off amounts to 3,000 gallons. That’s 3,000 gallons of clean, fresh water for cooking, washing, drinking, bathing etc. The idea of a shower every morning is something that wasn’t common practice until after World War II, and even wealthy families like the Bellamys probably only bathed once a week. Nevertheless, when the Bellamy house was in full swing, water usage would be high, and harvesting rainwater was essential. To catch and store it, there was the 6,000 gallon, brick-lined, underground cistern. The Bellamy cistern stored water that flowed from the roof of the house by a system of channels and downspouts on both sides of the house. Catch basins at ground level helped to filter out debris, and the water then traveled through underground drains directly into the cistern. A tightly fitted cover over the top kept out animals, bugs, surface water, and other contaminants. In her memoirs, Ellen Bellamy identifies “Guy, our butler” as the enslaved worker who pumped the water from the cistern into the large zinc-lined oak tank on the top floor, where the children spent much of their time. A gravity-fed pipe system carried the cold water down into the original bathroom on the floor below for use in bathing. According to architectural historian, Catherine Bishir, to provide hot water, pipes led from the tank to the kitchen boiler in the basement and back up to the bathroom. The flow of water was controlled so that water descending into the boiler forced the heated water to run up to the bathroom as needed. We do not know if the Bellamy cistern had a charcoal filter on it, but some homes in Wilmington did. For the next 50 years, the site operated solely on the well and cistern. The first attempt at a centralized water source in Wilmington was in 1881, at what was called the Clarendon Water Works, but it was intended for firefighting rather than drinking water. It wasn't until 1910-11 that the Bellamy House got city water, when the Hilton Pumping Station was put into operation at the site of the pre-revolutionary Hilton House built by Cornelius Harnett. Currently that site is the Sweeney Water Plant, Wilmington's main pumping station to this day.
"We had to install a suction line and put in a permanent well pump. We then connected all the irrigation lines to another pump outside the cistern located near the North rear scullery window next to the downspout. This allowed water to be pumped out of the cistern and then pumped again to the individual sprinkler stations." In addition to saving money on monthly water bills and reusing rainwater for everyday use, cisterns also help decrease flooding and protect our waterways by reducing polluted stormwater runoff. Although the introduction of city-wide plumbing led to decline of these ingenious systems, the city of Wilmington now encourages their use again due to these broader environmental benefits. They offer free resources about using rain barrels and cisterns as stormwater solutions. There is also a city-led “Heal Our Waterways” that provides funding to private property owners for installation of larger cisterns that would benefit Bradley Creek and Hewletts Creek. You can read more about the program at https://www.wilmingtonnc.gov/Services/Stormwater/Heal-Our-Waterways. This article was adapted, in part, from earlier work by former Director of Education at the Bellamy Mansion Museum, Madeline Flagler. During her time at the museum, Madeline developed and led "green tours" for adults and school groups using much of this information.
The Taylor Family Tree Henry and his wife Emily lived at 112 North 8th Street in a home that Henry built for the family, including their four children—John Edward, Anna Maria (Shober), Sarah Louise (Whiteman), and Robert Robinson— all of whom distinguished themselves.
John Edward Taylor remained in Wilmington and became a prosperous businessman and the first black man appointed Deputy Collector of Customs in the city, a position he held for 25 years. Anna Maria attended Howard University, as did her future husband, Dr. James Francis Shober, the first black physician with an M. D. degree to practice in North Carolina; a native of Winston-Salem, he spent his career in Wilmington. Sarah Louise Taylor likewise attended Howard University and married John Henry Whiteman, a prominent Wilmington businessman.
Robert Robinson Taylor's son, Robert Rochon Taylor, became an important corporate and civic figure in Chicago, for whom the large Chicago public housing complex, Robert Taylor Homes (completed in 1962), was named. Among Henry Taylor's descendants through this branch of the family is his great-great granddaughter, Barbara Taylor Bowman (1928-2024), early childhood education pioneer and consultant to the U.S. Secretary of Education during former President Barack Obama's first term. Bowman's daughter, Valerie Jarrett, a civic and political leader in Chicago, also worked under President Obama as a White House Senior Advisor from 2009-2017. Further Reading:
https://www.blackhistory.mit.edu/story/robert-r-taylor https://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/valerie-jarrett-women-rule-100673 https://nieer.org/pioneer-barbara-bowman https://www.dncr.nc.gov/blog/2016/06/08/wilmingtons-robert-r-taylor-pioneer-black-architect https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study_0724012_1.html https://about.usps.com/news/national-releases/2015/pr15_012.htm Imagine maintaining a home with 112 windows! The majority of those at the Bellamy site are double-hung windows with separate upper and lower sashes raised and lowered by heavy weights inside the window casings on each side. And, they were installed 165 years ago! Over time, wear and tear has caused the sash cords on some of the windows to snap. The job of fixing the windows is no easy task. Last year, six windows were targeted for restoration. In the photos shown here, Bellamy Museum volunteer handymen Angelo Cimini and Steve Long carefully removed the exterior window trim in order to take out the original windows. Once the windows were removed, they opened the access panel deliberately built into the window frame that houses the window weights. This system allows the windows to open smoothly and easily by counterbalancing the weight of the sash via a rope over a pulley. When the window goes up, the weight goes down. The weights for these particular windows were made of cast iron, measuring approximately two feet in length and weighing between 15 and 20 pounds each. Window Weight System In the Bellamy house windows, there is space for two weights on each side of the window. One weight was used to lift the lower sash, and the other allowed the upper sash to be lowered. While none of the windows currently allow the top sash to move, evidence shows that when the windows were new, both sashes were operable.
Since the 1970s the National Park Service has published its Preservation Briefs. These form a how-to library for fixing the many and varied elements of America's historic buildings. The schematic above is taken from the brief on wood windows, which you can read through this link:
https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1739/upload/preservation-brief-09-wood-windows.pdf The word ambrotype comes from the Greek ambrotos, meaning “immortal,” and typos, meaning “impression.” The name is fitting. These fragile photographs—made on glass and easily broken—were intended to preserve a likeness forever. In their quiet, ghostly beauty, ambrotypes represent a pivotal moment in the history of photography and in how people chose to remember themselves and their loved ones.
Popularity and Historical Context The ambrotype was introduced around 1854, when James Ambrose Cutting patented a version of the process in the United States. It quickly gained popularity and remained widely used throughout the 1850s and 1860s. During this period, ambrotypes filled the gap between the earlier daguerreotype and later photographic formats such as tintypes and paper prints. By the 1870s, ambrotypes fell out of favor. Newer photographic methods were cheaper, faster, and more durable, making them more convenient for both photographers and consumers. Despite their relatively brief period of popularity, ambrotypes played a crucial role in expanding photography beyond elite circles. Who Owned Ambrotypes? By the mid-nineteenth century, photography was no longer reserved solely for the wealthy elite. Ambrotypes were less expensive than daguerreotypes, making them accessible to working- and middle-class families. For many people, an ambrotype was the only photograph they would ever own. Farmers, laborers, and their families often commissioned a single portrait to document themselves or their household. Soldiers departing for the American Civil War frequently had ambrotypes taken to leave behind with loved ones, while sweethearts and engaged couples exchanged them as tokens of affection. Children’s portraits were also common, commissioned by parents who wanted to preserve an image of a child at a particular stage in life. Wealthier individuals also embraced ambrotypes, particularly in the 1850s when the format was considered modern and fashionable. For them, ambrotypes served as both status symbols and tools of legacy, preserving family lineage in a tangible form. Ambrotypes and the Bellamy Family Given the prominence and social standing of the Bellamy family, their ownership of ambrotypes is unsurprising. For wealthy families in the mid-nineteenth century, ambrotypes were both fashionable and meaningful. They preserved likenesses at a time when photography was still novel, capturing individuals at specific moments in their lives and allowing those images to be passed down through generations. These photographs freeze time, offering modern viewers a direct visual connection to the past. They serve not only as family heirlooms but also as historical documents, reflecting how people wished to be seen and remembered. An ambrotype of Frederick Douglass from the Civil War period. Held in the Smithsonian collection. Enslaved People and Ambrotypes Enslaved individuals were photographed during the ambrotype era, but they rarely owned these images. Most ambrotypes depicting enslaved people were commissioned by enslavers, often to document what they considered property or to portray enslaved individuals in carefully staged, sentimentalized roles. Some ambrotypes were created for abolitionist purposes, intended to humanize enslaved people and support anti-slavery efforts, particularly in the North. After emancipation, formerly enslaved people increasingly sought portraits of themselves and their families. These images served as powerful assertions of dignity, identity, and belonging in a society that had long denied them those rights. Before the Civil War, enslaved individuals generally lacked the money and legal standing to commission their own photographs. Even when portraits existed, ownership usually rested with the person who paid the photographer. Rare exceptions may have occurred in urban areas, but they were not typical.
This illustrates how ambrotypes could transcend their original context, becoming symbols of memory and enduring familial bonds. How Ambrotypes Were Made Creating an ambrotype required skill, speed, and precision. The process began with thoroughly cleaning a glass plate, as even the smallest speck of dust would appear in the final image. The photographer then coated the glass with collodion, a syrupy mixture of cellulose nitrate dissolved in ether and alcohol, combined with iodide salts. While the plate was still wet, it was immersed in a silver nitrate bath, making it sensitive to light. This step had to be completed immediately before exposure, which is why the method is known as the “wet plate” process. The plate was then placed into a camera and exposed while still wet. Exposure times ranged from a few seconds to several minutes, depending on lighting conditions. After exposure, the image was developed using chemicals such as iron sulfate or pyrogallic acid, revealing the photograph. A fixing solution—often potassium cyanide or sodium thiosulfate—was applied to make the image permanent. Once washed and dried, the glass plate was backed with a dark material so the negative image would appear positive.
Prices were influenced by the size of the glass plate, the quality of the case, whether the image was hand-colored, and the reputation or location of the photographer. Urban studios and well-known photographers often charged more, while traveling or rural photographers offered lower prices to attract customers. The information in this article was adapted from an interpretive plan prepared in the spring of 2025 by UNCW graduate student Melissa Howdershelt for her practica in Public History. The plan included a concept for constructing an exhibition using ambrotypes from the Bellamy Mansion Museum's collection, with the goal to educate its viewers.
Elvin Artis (1820-1886), a free black house carpenter, served as the carpentry foreman on the Bellamy Mansion project circa 1859-1861. James Post’s assistant architect, Rufus Bunnell, wrote in his diary about Artis, saying: “...strange to ever keep in mind, that almost to a man these mechanics (however seemingly intelligent), were nothing but slaves and capable as they might be, all the earnings that came from their work, was regularly paid over to their masters or mistresses. A very few, as for instance, the mulatto 'Artis' on the Bellamy house construction, were freedmen made thus by will or purchased freedom; but even those were restricted by special laws made for freed negroes and were also subject if deemed necessary, to observation by the day and night patrol.” Elvin Artis’s family traced their free status to the colonial period, and some of his ancestors served in the Revolutionary War. Elvin married Liza “Lizzie” (Green) around 1840, and between 1842 and 1858 the couple welcomed eight children, including three daughters -- Elizabeth, Jane (“Janie”), and Josephine. Two sons -- Hildred and Eldred -- were twins, and their other three sons were Champion, Sylvester, and John. Elvin Artis was not a stranger to John D. Bellamy when he began work on Bellamy’s townhome in 1859. In fact, Artis bought property from John D. Bellamy in 1845 near Love Grove and Smith Creek -- north of Oakdale Cemetery. In 1859, Elvin bought property on lot 282 from John D. Love, at the corner of 7th and Brunswick Streets, and his family resided in a home there for over fifty years. Today, the lot where the Artis home stood is empty. Elvin’s first wife, Liza, died sometime in the 1860s, and he married Caroline “Carrie” (Mitchell), a woman at least 15 years his junior, in March 1867. The city contracted Elvin for various projects throughout the 19th-century: Elvin also ran a prominent Wilmington barber shop and hair salon off and on during the 1860s, '70s, and '80s. He advertised barbering and tonsorial services for both men and women, and he ran his business during the early 1870s from the Purcell House Hotel on Front between Market and Princess. The Purcell House Hotel was advertised as Wilmington’s only first-class hotel at the time. While Elvin Artis never entered politics, it was not from lack of trying by his contemporaries. In 1882 he declined being nominated representative for the Greenback party’s county convention as he had, “no aspiration to attain political honors.” All of Elvin and Elizabeth’s sons married between 1862 and 1871. Two of Elvin’s sons, Eldred and John, became barbers and worked with their father, and John was also listed as a carpenter on the 1870 and 1880 censuses. Champion was a local carpenter and fireman. Hildred moved to Boston, Massachusetts, where he, too, was a barber. Two daughters -- Elizabeth and Jane -- married between 1868 and 1877. Josephine does not seem to have ever married.
Belle attended the South Carolina Female Collegiate Institute, commonly known as Barhamville Academy, located on the outskirts of Columbia. Beyond learning social graces and upper-class cultural rites, students at Barhamville had a set curriculum for each year with courses ranging from algebra, ancient history, botany and chemistry to art, music, literature and language. They were taught by highly regarded faculty attracting the elite of the South. Its graduates included the Hon. John C. Calhoun's daughter Anna Maria and the future mother of President Theodore Roosevelt, Martha Bulloch. Ellen noted "as my father was contemplating this house [on Market Street] she made a drawing of it and assisted Mr. Rufus Bunnell, the architect, in modeling this after that manner." Belle's brother John also noted in his memoirs that her "plan of the building was turned over by my father to James F. Post, contractor and builder." The final design of the Bellamy Mansion, aside from being stylistically similar, is in no way an exact duplicate of the Clarkson home, which fell victim to Union General William Tecumseh Sherman's fiery Civil War march through the South. Belle also had some input into the interior decor of the new house. In 1860, nearing her 20th birthday, she accompanied her parents and infant brother Chesley on their trip to New York City to look at samples of building materials and select furnishings for their soon-to-be completed 22-room mansion on Market Street. Her sense of style may well have figured into the selection of their fashionable new furniture and fabrics.
Beautiful Belle, the only Bellamy daughter to marry, died in January 1900 at age 59 after a protracted illness. Her obituary in The Wilmington Messenger noted that she had been very sick at home in Columbia and decided to come to Wilmington to her mother's home "for the special purpose of placing herself under the treatment of her brother, Dr. W.H. Bellamy." Belle died in the Bellamy house where her funeral was held thereafter, and she was buried at Oakdale Cemetery in Wilmington. In 1908, the Duffie family disinterred Belle's remains from the Bellamy plot and took them to South Carolina, where she was laid to rest beside her husband who passed away in 1901. Belle's Paintings This is an updated version of a piece on the slave quarters renovation from the Fall 2014 issue of Preservation NC magazine: Our historic buildings often hold mysteries just waiting to be uncovered. The slave quarters at the Bellamy Mansion Museum in Wilmington is no exception. Back in 1993, when the entire property was conveyed by Bellamy Mansion, Inc. to Preservation NC for restoration and operation, we knew little about the small, handsome building in the back northeastern corner of the property. The building had severely deteriorated through the years, and its counterpart on the northwest corner, the carriage house, was long gone. Only a stack of bricks remained of that. While there are no windows at the back of the Bellamy Museum slave quarters, there are more than enough on the front of the building to provide the enslaved people who lived and worked there a constant reminder of the family and the house they served across the back yard. A 1994 grant enabled us to research both the slave quarters and carriage house to learn more about the property's African-American legacy. Research historian and author Peter Sandbeck completed a historic structures report on the slave quarters, while teacher and African-American history specialist Alice Eley Jones researched the people who would have lived in those buildings. These studies, together with extensive archaeological research, and more than $1 million in private support, led to the reconstruction of the missing carriage house in the early 2000s; landscaped grounds and gardens; and in 2014 the restored slave quarters.
The building had badly deteriorated because of many decades of roof leaks and termite damage. Any element that was intact and stable was left unaltered. Alongside that, areas of the original 1859 plasterwork and new 2013 plasterwork stand side-by-side, with no effort to disguise the difference. However, the restoration process went as far as to match the fineness of the sand, source of lime, and variety of horsehair in the plaster to get it as true to the original as possible.
Perhaps the most striking discovery at the end of our restoration projects has been the sheer beauty of the two complementary buildings behind the Bellamy mansion. Finished with a pinkish slaked lime wash and dark green shutters to mimic their likely original state, the slave quarters and carriage house are now unabashed examples of 1859 Italianate style.
One can't overlook the irony that the beauty of these buildings contrasts with the evil of slavery. And yet, the survival of these buildings has allowed us both to learn more about the full history of the site and to teach visitors more effectively about our state's complicated heritage. Edited from Preservation North Carolina's Fall 1998 quarterly magazine In 1998 Preservation NC printed a newsletter and it ran the story, “An Unsolved History Mystery.” The staff-written piece examined what was known and not known of the design and function of the Bellamy's carriage house, which was likely built alongside the slave quarters around 1859 and was demolished by the City due to disrepair in 1946. An accurate understanding of the structure’s exterior elevation and fenestration has always been hampered by a marked lack of photographic evidence. While the “magic “ image that shows the structure clearly and in its entirety has not yet surfaced, researchers have found some other enlightening photographic evidence. This imagery coupled with archeological finds gave us a much better idea of how the building looked and worked. In reviews of visual information, only obscured bits and pieces of the building peeked out from behind a wall shrubbery and trees. By enlarging and enhancing the contrast of these images, we could accurately project the location of a few windows and doors. Another photograph indicated that the structure was slightly shorter than the existing slave quarters. Based on this general information and the existing 18’x 65’ foundation walls, we assembled the equivalent of a pretty good police sketch of the structure. Some details remained unknown. Other photographs that surfaced briefly in the 1990s did answer some lingering questions. A descendent of a property owner immediately north of the carriage house was visiting from New Orleans and just happened to have some old photographs taken in the back yard next door. They, unfortunately, did not leave the image for our archive but it showed the back of the building and that its roofline was symmetrical, with parapet steps on the back wall on both the east and west ends. Staff previously assumed that the carriage house was a mirror image of the slave quarters, which is a building with a parapet back wall on one end and flat on the opposite. Another image showed that the second floor of the structure had arched windows, a feature that was assumed, but previously had no evidence to support. Additionally, a lattice fence was apparent in this image. It ran parallel to the face of the entire structure.
It seems possible that in its early years enslaved workers Tony Bellamy and Guy Nixon may have stayed in this building from time to time with the animals and supplies. While we may never learn everything about this structure, staff in the 1990s certainly knew much more than when PNC took on the project. Using this limited but helpful historical information, Preservation NC raised funds for building’s reconstruction as an interpretive/educational center for the site. Costing over $300,000 it was completed in 2001 and still serves as our visitor center. It retains the footprint of the original building, the parapet walls on the roof, and a fake door on the western end mimics what would have existed on 5th St. Unlike the original, we do not keep horses, a carriage, or a cow inside. The current museum restrooms between the carriage house and slave quarters were originally the site of a poultry shed. The back yard featured an herb garden, fig tree, coal chute, cistern and well. It was very much a working space. The back wall between carriage house and slave quarters was rebuilt during the 2001 project. The original wall was partly to keep the compound sealed in. This had obvious implications for enslaved workers on site in the early 1860s as the carriage house, the wall, and the slave quarters had no windows, gates, or doors facing north. That fact prevented unseen escape and, along with those parapet walls on the buildings' roofs, also acted as a firebreak. The reconstruction of the carriage house on the original footprint in 2001.
|
Older Blog Posts
To see all previous blog posts, please click here. Blogs written after summer 2020 will be found on this page. AuthorOur blogs are written by college interns, staff, and Bellamy volunteers. Archives
June 2026
Categories |







RSS Feed